___________________________________________________________________________
COMMISSION OF INQUIRY
INTO ADMINISTRATIVE IRREGULARITIES IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
AND ACTIVITIES OF MEMBERS OF SECRET SOCIETIES
___________________________________________________________________________
PRELIMINARY REPORT
ON
A PILOT INVESTIGATION
INTO
MILITARY INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
IN RURAL COMMUNITIES
IN EXECUTING THE MANDATE OF:-
“SOCIAL CONDITIONING (I.E. BRAINWASHING )
COMMUNITY LEADERS
UNDER THE GUISE OF
AGRICULTURAL TRAINING WORKSHOPS
IN ORDER TO
BRING ABOUT CULTURAL MIND SHIFTS
THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE
INTER ALIA
A NEW POLITICAL ORDER.”
By Izak Labuschagne
(Investigative field officer)
THE COMMISSION OF
INQUIRY INTO ADMINISTRATIVE IRREGULARITIES IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND
ACTIVITIES BY MEMBERS OF SECRET SOCIETIES
a.
This Commission was condoned
by His Lordship Justice Mall of the Durban and Coast Local Division
of the Supreme Court of South Africa (Now on the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission) on the 24th day of May 1995 as per pages
11 at 20-30, 12 at 5 and 14 of the transcript of case No A 175/93).
b.
The Commission manifests
as an Actio Popularis Commission.
c.
It operates under Sections
8(1) 9, 15, 18, 32, 33, 34, 38, 198, 231 (5), 232, 233, and Schedule 6 (22) of Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa and as such is independent of any organ of state).
d.
It’s Terms of Reference
covers inter alia any other related matters into the topic of
it’s description.
e.
This Commission does not
fall under the Commission's Statute, and is therefore appropriately able to independently
and without encumbrances to investigate organs of state in line
with the official state doctrine of Openness and Transparency._
f.
None of it’s
investigating officers are Officers of Court in order that it may similarly
appropriately investigate the activities of Officers of Court (i.e. attorneys,
Advocates , Public Prosecutors, Magistrates and Judges.
g.
This Commission has, at
this stage, no quasi judicial powers of itself, but it may provide
evidence to any other personam, instance or agency, in any litigation before
the Courts or any other recognised forum, or to bodies fulfilling similar roles
such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
h.
This Commission or any
of it’s members, agents and employees may litigate in personam, or under section
38 of the Constitution, or on any other legal grounds as are disposable to
any person at law in any tribunal or forum as provided for under Section
34 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, having regard to
such international instruments as the Helsinki Accord in line with the
provisions encapsulated in sections 321, 232 and 39 of the Constitution
.
i.
This Commission has
found it necessary (due to a host of death threats against it’s investigating
officers) that the findings of this Commission be published on the Internet
from time to time in order to secure the safety of the investigating officers.
Access to the web sight concerned is secured under the auspices of
International Agencies engaged in similar investigations and are therefore
not as yet accessible to the public at large.
j.
Members of the public
are invited to supply any information that may assist this Commission in it’s
investigations.
k.
This commission is assisted
by local and International Agencies involved in similar work.
l.
This Commission is not state funded but independently funded from the
populous at large.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Training Manual No. TM-SW7905.1
Very Low Infra Sound Frequency (VLISF)
National Intelligence and Political
Parties
Right Wing Religious Movements
Constitutional Court Judgments
Overview of Onslaught on Rural
Community
Rural Development Corporation
(Lanok)
Surplus Peoples Projects (SPP).
Brainwashing through the local
church
Current plans to Stifle this report
Brainwashing is not a new concept.
It was used during both World Wars, Korea, Vietnam, The Gulf War,
extensively in the USSR, and in the context set out in the heading to
this report in the South West Africa (SWA) Boarder War conducted by
South Africa in the 70’s and 80’. It is used extensively today by various
agencies such as the Tri Lateral Commission (TLC), The Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR) and various UN agencies such as the United
Nations Peace Corps (UN PC) in order to assist with brokering peace
amongst conflicting nations and communities, fostering democratisation in authoritarian regimes, and in
counteracting religious extremism. It is conducted through various
mediums such as direct contact, training camps, media exposure, radio
broadcasts, religious services, primary, secondary and tertiary education
and even Biological Aids (mostly added to drinking water,
foodstuffs and medication. The Science of Social Automation Technology
is highly developed today and makes use of extensive computer hardware and software
that was developed both in the Nato and the Warsaw Countries. In fact
the USSR are leaders in fields such as Computer Generated Emotional Mind
Mapping.
Just prior to the 1994
elections the national media[1]
disclosed how Dr. Johan Van Der Westhuizen was running an MI front
organisation called Adult Education Consultants (AEC) in Soweto under
the orders of Joffel Van der Westhuizen (MI chief at that stage) and Tertius
Delport Minister of Agriculture in the Western Cape. This group was to
install (through Adult Education) a cultural shift in the
community that would bring about a drop in township unrest in order to ensure a
smooth transition of power to the ANC. Van Der Westhuizen had also
infiltrated the African Christian Democratic Party[2] which was to
serve as the future home of the NP under a moderate black leadership, that
would be coaxed into the Masonic Fraternity in order to ensure cohesion and
security of the central mandate (especially once the massive overseas
funding planned for the project got underway).
During the South African
Boarder War, National Servicemen that were selected for duty in Military
Intelligence were screened at Voortrekker Hoogte (where they did
their security Clearances) and were then sent to Grootfontein in SWA
where further screening took place. They then underwent a training course in Windhoek
and later a more intense course at Hartswater in southern SWA. Once it
was determined that they were able to successfully conduct training
(brainwashing) they were sent to operational area headquarters (such as at Katimo
Mulilo in the Caprivi Strip in
northern SWA where it boarders on Zambia, Botswana and Zimbabwe
(Rhodesia then). Here they ran Agricultural Training Seminars which were designed as workshops.
Community leaders were first studied and then hand picked for the training
workshops / seminars (in reality highly
researched and successful brainwashing sessions). At the seminars they were
taught, life skills, skills in conflict management, stereotype reduction,
social management skills in a very subtle yet highly manipulative
interactive, perform and be rewarded type of workshop environment
seminars.
In 1983 for example, the
officer in charge of the Katimo Mulilo Group was Mc Sweeny,
assisted by psychiatrist Costallo.
Typical of the manuals
developed for this type of operation was Training Manual No. TM-SW7905.1[3] This manual is entitled Silent Weapons for Quite Wars, Therein the
science of Social Automation Technology is succinctly set out complete
with Tables of Strategies and a list of Inputs and Outputs:-
Under the Historical
Introduction we read that Silent Weapon Technology evolved
from Operations Research (O.R), a strategic and tactical methodology
developed under Military Management in England during WW II...It was
soon recognised by the Council on Foreign Relations as an effective
means of controlling society.
In the Formal
Introduction we read the following:-
The solution to today's problems requires an approach that is
ruthlessly candid, with no agonising over religious moral or cultural values”,
and as such must be ‘secured from public scrutiny”.
Under the heading, Descriptive
Introduction of the Silent Weapon we read:-
Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a
silent weapon by it’s creators, but only in it’s own manner of junctioning
It shoots situations instead of bullets, propelled by data processing,
instead of a chemical reaction, (explosion); originating from bits of data instead
of grains of gunpowder, from a computer instead of a gun; operated by a
computer programmer instead of a marksman, under the orders of a banking
magnate instead of a general.
It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or
mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social
life.
Yet it makes an unmistakable “noise”, causes unmistakable physical and
mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e.,
unmistakable to the trained observer, one who knows what to look for.
The public cannot comprehend that they are being attacked by a weapon,
and therefore cannot believe that they are being subdued by a weapon.
The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but
because of the technical nature of the silent weapon they cannot express their
feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore
they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with
others to defend themselves against it.
When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts / adapts
to it’s presence and learns to tolerate it’s encroachment on their lives..
Therefore the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks
the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of society by knowing,
understanding, manipulating, and attacking their resources of natural and
social energy, and their physical and mental, and emotional strengths and
weaknesses.
In preparation of
the area targeted for the application of the Silent Weapon a programs of
studying the communities habit patterns is undertaken under a list of Inputs
(surveillance) and Outputs (tailored on the findings of the
surveillance) which covers inter alia the following headings:-
Inputs
General Sources of
information
1.
telephone
taps
2.
surveillance
3.
analysis
of garbage
4.
behaviour
of children
Standard of living
by:
1.
Food
2.
Clothing
3.
Shelter
4.
Transportation
Social Contacts
1.
Telephone
- itemised record of calls
2.
family
- marriage certificates, birth certificates etc..
3.
friends,
associates, etc.
4.
membership
in organisations
5.
political
affiliation
THE PERSONAL PAPER TRAIL
Personal
buying habits, i.e., personal consumer preferences
1.
Checking
accounts
2.
Credit
Credit-card purchases
3.
“tagged”
credit card purchases - the credit purchase of products bearing the UPC
(universal product Code)
Assets:
1.
Checking
accounts
2.
savings
accounts
3.
real
estate
4.
business
5.
automobile
etc..
6.
safety
deposit at bank
7.
stock
market
Liabilities
1.
creditors
2.
enemies
(see-legal)
3.
loans
4.
consumer
credit
Government
sources (ploys)*
1.
welfare
2.
social
security
3.
surplus
food
4.
doles
5.
grants
6.
subsidies
*
Principal of this ploy
- the citizen will almost always make the collection of information easy if he can operate on the principal
of the “free sandwich principal” of “eat now, and pay later”
Government
sources (via intimidation)
1.
Internal
revenue service
2.
OSHA
3.
Census
4.
etc..
Other
government sources - surveillance of US mail.
Habit Patterns - Programming
Strengths
and weaknesses,
1.
activities (sports, hobbies etc..)
2.
see
“legal” (fear anger, etc.. - crime record)
3.
hospital
records (drug sensitivities, reaction to pain, etc..)
4.
psychiatric
records (fears, angers, disgusts, adaptability, reactions to stimuli, violence,
suggestibility or hypnosis, pain, pleasure, love and sex)
Methods of
Coping - of adaptability - behaviour
1.
consumption
of alcohol
2.
consumption
of drugs
3.
entertainment
religious factors influencing behaviour
4.
other
methods of escaping from reality
Payment
modus operandi,
1.
payment
of telephone bills
2.
energy
purchases (electricity, gas etc..)
3.
water
purchases
4.
repayment
of loans
5.
house
payments
6.
automobile
payments
7.
payments
on credit cards
Political
sensitivity
1.
beliefs
2.
contacts
3.
position
4.
strengths/weaknesses
5.
projects/activities
Legal
inputs - behavioural control (excuses for investigation, search, arrest, or
employment of force to modify behaviour)
1.
court
records
2.
police
records - NCIC
3.
driving
record
4.
reports
made to police
5.
insurance information
6.
antiestablishment acquaintances
NATIONAL INPUT INFORMATION
Business
sources (via I.R.S., etc..)
1.
prices
of commodities
2.
sales
3.
investments
in
a.
stocks
/ inventory
b.
production
tools and machinery
c.
buildings
and improvements
d.
the
stock market
Banks
and credit bureaus
1.
credit
information
2.
payment
information
Miscellaneous
sources:
3.
polls
and surveys
4.
publications
5.
telephone
records
6.
energy
and utility purchases
SHORT LIST OF OUTPUTS
Outputs
- create controlled situations - manipulation of economy, hence society -
control by control of compensation and income
Sequence:
7.
allocates
opportunities
8.
destroys
opportunities
9.
controls
the economic environment
10.
controls
the availability of raw materials
11.
controls
capital
12.
controls
bank rates
13.
controls
the inflation rate
14.
controls
the possession of property
15.
controls
industrial capacity
16.
controls
manufacturing
17.
controls
the availability of goods
18.
controls
the prices of commodities
19.
controls
services, the labour force, etc..
20.
controls
payments to government officials
21.
controls
the legal functions
22.
controls
the personal data files - uncorrectable by the party slandered.
23.
controls
advertising
24.
controls
media contact
25.
controls
material available for TV viewing
26.
disengages
attention from real issues
27.
engages
emotions
28.
creates
disorder, chaos, and insanity
29.
controls
design of more probing tax forms
30.
controls
surveillance
31.
controls
the storage of information
32.
develops
psychological analysis and profiles of individuals
33.
controls
legal functions (repeat of 15)
34.
controls
sociological factors
35.
controls
health options
36.
preys
on weaknesses
37.
cripples
strengths
38.
leaches wealth and substance
TABLE OF STRATEGIES
Do this To
get this
Keep
the public ignorant Less
public organisation
Maintain
access control to point Require
reaction to outputs (prices sales)
of
feedback
Create
preoccupation Lower
defences
Attach
the family unit Control
of the education of the young
Give
less cash and more credit and doles More
self indulgence and more data
Attack
the privacy of the church Destroy
faith in this sort of government
Social
conformity Computer
programming simplicity
Minimise
the tax protest Maximum
economic data, minimum enforcement problems
stabilise
the consent Minimum
coefficients
Tighten
control of variables Simpler
computer input data - greater predictability
Establish
boundary conditions Problem
simplicity / solutions of differential and different
equations
Proper
timing less
data shift and blurring
Maximise
control minimum
resistance to control
Collapse
of currency destroy the
faith of people in each other
The
techniques employed vary from case to case but follow a basic sociological /
psychological approach, perhaps best described by the following:-
DIVERSION THE PRIMARY STRATEGY
Experience
has proven that the SIMPLEST METHOD of securing a silent weapon and gaining
control of the public is to KEEP THE PUBLIC
UNDISCIPLINED AND IGNORANT of the basic systems principals on the one
hand, WHILE KEEPING THEM CONFUSED, DISORGANISED, AND DISTRACTED, with matters
of no real importance on the other hand.
This is achieved by
39.
disengaging their
minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of
public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics ; and discouraging
technical creativity.
40.
Engaging their
emotions , increasing their self indulgence and their indulgence in emotional
and physical activities , by:
a. unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks
(mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and
wars in the media - especially the TV and newspapers.
b. giving them what they desire -
in excess - “junk food for though” - and depriving them of what they really
need
c. REWRITING HISTORY and LAW and
SUBJECTING THE PUBLIC TO THE DEVIANT CREATION, thus being able to SHIFT THEIR
THINKING from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities
These
preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social Automation.
The
general rule is that there is profit in confusion, the more confusion the more
profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer the
solutions.
The
Harvard Economic Research Project of 1948
forms the basis of the Economic
Model employed in the manual, which divides people into three Industrial
Classes i.e.:
1.
Capital
(resources
2.
Goods
(commodities or use - dissipate)
3.
Services (action
of population)
a.nature sources of
energy and raw materials
b.Government
- printing of currency equal to gross national product
Extensive
Industrial Diagrams accompany the manual, all of which cannot be included in
this report.
As to
the detailed approach used in training (brainwashing) seminars, the following
should suffice to describe the basic approach model employed. One again this
varies from case to case:-
The
USA expository newsletter Mainstream[4] provided
extracts from a 200 page document entitled Apotheosis Top Secret which exposed how government officials were able
to set about shifts in belief patterns in society. Here is a brief outline of
the approach to be used:-
A.
Work
slowly and gently. Establish common ground between subject and brain washer
affirming present beliefs to generate a an atmosphere of trust and fellowship
B.
Isolate
the subject from anything that reinforces his present beliefs, while at the
same time immersing the subject in the new belief environment. Allow no time
for thought or reflection - this can be done by constant companionship between
subject and brain washer
.
C.
Generate
a deeper emotional alliance between subject and brain washers. Develop
belonging and companionship.
D.
Increase
emotional alliance while presenting new beliefs in ways that do not directly
trigger contrast or argument.
E.
Begin
to dismantle the old beliefs by playful mockery and introduce camouflaged
version of new beliefs.
F.
Suggest
the old belief is no longer valid or useful, and is subservient to the new belief
which has now superseded it, while immersing subject in a sense of just cause.
G.
Remove
subjects last connections and habits relating to the old belief using sleep
deprivation, changes in diet, new life patterns and emotional dependency.
H.
When
subject repeatedly shows allegiance to new belief, begin direct teaching - do
not mention the old belief or refer to it.
I.
When
subject shows understanding and acceptance of the naked, undisguised new
belief, challenge the old belief and overthrow it.
J.
The
brainwashing process is now complete, and the subject will now filter
experiences in an manner that reinforces the new belief. Thus it becomes a self
perpetuating process.
What
is of course not mentioned in the above is that those who refuse to fall for
this then become isolated in the community that has been successfully
brainwashed and their children who are forced to interact with the community
through schooling are then brainwashed through relentless school activities and
turned against the parents. Then next generation is then secured even if all of
the present cannot.
Modern
techniques such as the use of VLISF (Very Low Infra Sound Frequency)
transmitted through TV and Radio networks and the Emotional Mind Mapping Intro-control
Techniques (EMMIT) developed by the KGB are also frequently
used. Nowadays, of course the New Age type self enhancement techniques at
taught by the groups concerned herein are in vogue. Especially with traditional
African communities as spirit guides are often used and this fits in neatly
with ancestor worship etc..
Bear
in mind also that the MI and NI brainwashing techniques currently being used
are an offshoot of the USA Mind Control
Ultra (MK ULTRA) which heavily leans on New Age / Esoteric / Satanic /
and in Africa, witch doctor type
activity, in training it’s training officers. [5].
Few
people know what Ubuntu really Is. It is in fact a description for the common
cohesiveness experienced by Africans due to the common phonetically roots in
all African Languages. Kaunda redefined Ubuntu along the socialist Workers
Revolution lines and promoted it through Zambia as a Black Power
enhancement tool. There was quite a bit of heated debating in African
Educational circles as to how Ubuntu should be presented and it was decided to
stay away from the ultra Communistic interpretation and stick with something
more cultural. Today Ubuntu workshops are run for Large Business Corporations
in South Africa in order to facilitate the political doctrine of
Affirmative Action[6].
What
one must bear in mind of course is that South Africa is a secular state but
with a specific philosophy built into the Constitution of the country - that of
UBUNTU[7].
The Integrated Community Development Association (ICDA) a part of The
Independent Democratic Association of South Africa (IDASA) (which
benefits from massive overseas funding (such as from the World Wildlife Fund
and Coca Cola) defines Ubuntu as “I am because we are and we are because I
am”. This is off course a classic Secular Humanist technique to overthrow
belief in God and absolutes. The Manual employs advanced Social Automation
(Engineering) Technology (SAT)
techniques and is acutely relativistic.
The CDA has a subsidiary called the Interfaith
Community Development Association
(ICDA)[8]
which aggressively promotes interfaith in order to limit the development of
stereotypes and to promote tolerance in communities. The IDA constitutes a
direct attack on the Christian belief that one must always guard against
false teaching and manipulation (the manifestation of witch craft).
In
the ACDP case referred to in footnote no 2 on page 3, a fax from National
Intelligence[9]
was intercepted. It stated the following:-
Directive
1994 Election
Strategic
Agents in place - refer previous communication
Target
No 1 - standard orders
Target
No 2 - African Christian Democratic Party
Brief
- new party, formed recently to attract Christian votes
Danger
- 1990 statistics
23,603,000 Christians in large
SA total 77%
319,000 Islam in larger SA only 1%
ACDP
could attract large % of Christian votes
To
enforce religious equality Islam must be stimulated refer
Kronberger
1935/234 parties already established
formed
through multi-lines
Order
- No direct contact! Phase in over five years refer
Five
year plan. ACDP disinformation to be strategic leader to targeted -
surveillance. Infiltration authorised - Pro-parties to run media advertisement
stimulation of religious conscience.
In
1995 already a reporter[10]
exposed a plan (bankrolled by Muammar
Gaddafi and other Arab leaders) to “Islamise South Africa” in order to
achieve “economic cultural and finally, political unity”.
On
the 25th of January 1995 President Mandella of South Africa signed an agreement[11]
with
Prime
Minister Narasimha Rao of India. wherein the following was agreed:-
RECOGNISING that they share the ideals of peace, democracy and secular
governance;
The High Contracting Parties condemn all forms of hatred, violence,
fundamentalism and religious extremism[12].
Bear
in mind that these agreements form part of the law of South Africa[13]
.
In
the Journal of Theology For South Africa[14], the
Government’s main reference periodical,
Right Wing religious Movements were identified. These included
1.
Campus
Crusade for Christ
2.
Jimmy
Swaggert Mission United Christian Action
3.
Signposts
4.
Bet-El
group of Ministries
5.
Christian
Mission International
All
of them benign Evangelical movements that have absolutely no political agenda.
What is characteristic of these organisations however, is that they preach a
very Bible based message and are critical of Liberation Theology (a Theological
standpoint that promotes Christ as the “first Communist Revolutionary and
Freedom Fighter”.[15]
Ubuntu
Is a very important state doctrine in South Africa. The Centre For
Constitutional Analysis[16]
said that :-
The promotion of Ubuntu will be a fundamental contribution towards building
democracy. It also lies at the heart of the Reconstruction and Development
Program. Giving people back their self-respect and dignity is to begin to
reconstruct and develop society. Not to do so is to be destructive.
The
Constitutional Court upheld a ruling that meant that the Bible does not form
part of a church’s laws in considering internal disputes in the church.[17] The High Court judge[18]
misrepresented what was argued and then refused to release the record. There was
no hearing at the Constitutional Court despite the fact that 4 million people
petitioned the Court.
This
is pertinently in line with the doctrines set out by the famous secular
humanist John Dewey[19]
the father of modern progressive education and his accomplices who stated
openly:-
There
is no god and no soul. Hence, there are no needs for the props of traditional
religion. With dogma and creed excluded, then immutable (unchangeable) truth is also dead and buried. There is no room for fixed
natural law or permanent moral absolutes.
On
this humanistic view Professor Harold J Berry[20] stated:-
The
Humanist Manifesto states:
“Humanism....
does insist that the way to determine the existence of any and all realities is
by means of intelligent inquiry and by the assessment of their relation to
human needs”
This
is situation ethics - that right and wrong depend on the situation. Everything
is relative.
Under
Relativist the concepts of truth and non-truth become blurred. As a
consequence, people, once they accept relativism, by definition cannot know
what the truth is. Instead, they can only guess as to the best course to
follow. Thus it becomes easier to sell non-truth to such a society.
Secular
Humanism is a closed system. As such it will eventually seek to eliminate alternative viewpoints. The
secular state wants no competition in the arena of ideas. Furthermore, let
there be no misunderstanding. Secular Humanists in key positions of leadership
in government will do all they can to stamp out Biblical Christianity
Samual
Huntington (president of the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission (TLC)
member - served as top dialogue to David Rockefeller) with fellow professor Zbigniew
Brzezinski (KGB under cover agent) visit South Africa on a regular basis.
In his lecture “The Third Wave; Democratisation in the Late Twentieth
Century”[21]
comprises a detailed dirty tricks manual for overthrowing governments and
ushering in a secular order which will fit in with the New World Order.
This is the order that Pik Both, George
Bush and Nelson Mandella have already so well defined for us.
And
the media plays along as David Rockefeller so succinctly admitted at the
Bilderbergers 25th Meeting when he
thanked the New York Times, Washington Post, Time Magazine, Associated
Press, Reuters, News Week, NBC/RCA, ABC and many more for keeping mum over
the last 40 years of their clandestine planning for secular world governance:-
It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of publishing during these years.
In
the last seven years of researching secret societies and the inevitable
conspiracies such societies keep themselves busy with (otherwise why should
they be secret), and especially in my research with Agricultural Unions and
overseas advisors, researchers and authorities on the subject, all of it would
be far too voluminous (even in condensed form) to include in anything under 300
pages) it has become crystal clear to me that the onslaught against the
rural community is as simply as this:-
1.
Brainwash the
community (under the cover of “Agricultural training”) into a new mind set -
away from absolutes the belief in God and especially the adherence to the
doctrine of “take heed that ye be not deceived’ into the secular
humanist belief system called UBUNTU in the Southern African context. Hence the
emergence of the Bible Case Precedent.[22]
2.
Should this fail,
manoeuvre the farmer into a situation where he requires financing.
3.
Present cheap
financing through government agencies and entangle him in a lending instrument
that is designed to force him to attend further brainwashing and thereby to
ultimately control him entirely - always keeping him in debt and tied to the
financiers who are forever helping him to make a success through further
‘training. (see extracts of Landbou Krediet Raad document below)
4.
if the above does
not succeed to then destroy his gearing ratios which will result in
sequestration of his estate. (At this point they normally say to the rest - “see,
he would not stick to the training’). He has then been displaced so that a
successfully brainwashed subject can occupy the land - ready and willing to be
used by the government in control. (see extracts of Land bank document below)
5.
Should this fail
- use paramilitary force (financed from abroad) that will launch terrorist
strikes against such farmers under the cover of 'robbery as the primary motive’ disarming them in the process and
providing reasons for disarmament of the masses by legislation because it lends
credence to the spurious notion thus
created that ‘privately owned weapons cannot be successfully secured and are
therefor ending up in the wrong hands - removed these licences and crime will
decrease’
6.
Expropriate land
through legislation after disarmament thus minimising the chances of civil war
(expropriation has always been the most classic catalyst for civil war).
Sound
far fetched? Let’s look at the evidence accumulated (quite accidentally) in
just a few months in a remote rural area in the North West of South Africa.
First
the Transitional Local Council (TLC) was softened up. This was done by
involving them in training:-
Locally,
the Steinkopf Transitional Council have already been the 'beneficiaries
“ of some training . This body, as anyone can identify, plays an important role
in the set-up of things, so they too needed to be conditioned as soon as
possible. The very first work shop is entitled
“Stereotype Reduction module”. The Course was presented by
Gouws Woods and Partners ‘Specialists in conflict intervention, human
resource development and organisational transformation’ .
Here
follows the course modules:-
6.
Stereotype
reduction workshop
7.
Affirmative
action
8.
Empowerment
through communication
9.
Conflict
management
Then
the farming Community had to be subdued. In the area in question, this was
important because the area has enormous agricultural potential[24]
and extraordinary mineral wealth. What is more, it was formally under the Tribal
Areas Act and therefore was traditional under the control of Government
structures. Indeed, it still is, believe it or not - private
ownership of even land that has been developed by the tenants as
Irrigation Land[25]
has still not been facilitated :-
Bear
in mind also that I had an altercation with MI agents the day after our meeting
with Tom De Wet in which I advised him of similar MI activity through Lanok as
a front organisation (see inter alia the article 29th June on Lanok Rapport)
wherein Lanok are engaged with exactly the same type of training under their “Free
to Grow” course at Elim. The article describes how Lanok (Landelike
Ontwikkelings Korporasie) which is largely funded by the Department of Housing,
sets about assisting small farmers to become agriculturally more successful by
introducing them to a 4 week agricultural training course.
The
course which was designed by Alinda Nortje over a 4 year period (i.e..
from 1994 to now), is presented by Jonathan Martinus and concentrates on
the following:-
1. Self image enhancement
2. Responsibility and initiative
building
3. Change acceptance conditioning
4. Emotional training
5. Helping people to crawl out of
their shells
6. Positive thinking and living
-All classic Mind
Control approach modules.
In Lanok’s
case the Executive Director Tom De Wet’s response was to try and dismiss
the notion as untrue instead of being concerned and wanting more information as
would be expected from someone who is not involved in such activities
themselves.
By way of subtly introducing itself to farmers normally by making
representation to the Local Transitional Council in the area Lanok do
this under the widely advertised Lanok Mission Statement which
reads as follows:-
"Service to and with communities through
integrated people orientated agricultural and rural
development
IN ORDER TO
improve the quality and standard of life of
especially the low income part of
the population
TO ACHIEVE
happy, self sustained communities
I COMMIT MYSELF TO:
fulfil our mission.
respect for the individual.
Strive after success.
Acceptance of CO-responsibility.
Integrity and ethical conduct as a way of life.
Open and honest communication.
Professional action orientated conduct.
positive thought.
Co-operation and humanity.
Pursue creativity and innovation."
When arrived
here I was asked by one of the farmers to represent him in the light of problems that had developed with Lanok.
In short:-
1.
Lanok failed
completely in their mission to uplift the farming community,
2.
In stead they drew up a
series of highly aggressive instruments of debt (that is, after the
debts were already accrued on the basis of the mission statements)
2.1.
I must point out here
that the subsequent agreements were not at all in line with the basis upon
which the loans were presented. The farmers owed money, they had to sign -
besides the Department of Agriculture told them the agreements were
‘standard’ and they had nothing to worry about.
3.
They proceeded to take sessions
on all the assets of the farmers[27]
4.
They manoeuvred
themselves into the position where they became the only service provider in
the whole area[28],
as opposed to a farmer who was in the process of doing so and was ruthlessly
squashed by Lanok.
5.
An agreement was thrust
upon the farmers that they were not allowed to acquire any shares, assets or
machinery without Lanok’s approval[29]
6.
they took sessions on
all future crops and total control as to when the crops were established,
harvested and marketed.[30]
6.1.
(including the rental
agreements operative on the properties with the Transitional Council),
[31]
7.
The interest rates
increased until they eventually stand at the top interest permissible
under the Usury Act. [32]
8.
Lanok took over complete control of their farming
operations describing this as “a prescribed works
methodology for the successful management of Lucerne / vegetables”. [33]
8.1.
under this prescription
the following was covered:-
8.1.1.
Crop
Establishment needs for the Successful Management of Lucerne / vegetables
8.1.2.
Maintenance
actions
8.1.3.
Sprinkler
Irrigation
8.1.4.
Flood irrigation
8.1.5.
Cutting actions
8.1.6.
Fertilising
8.1.7.
Sale of Lucerne and
vegetables
9.
The model used was
apparently developed in Grootfontein, which is hundreds of kilometres from
the area and does not have the same conditions.
10.
The losses were
to say the least, nothing but utterly ruthless in their persistence:-
11.
A farmer that used
to live on the R 3,500.00 per month that he made of his own accord
(before the experts came to show him how to farm really successfully) was granted
R 527 per month by Lanok to live which meant that he had to take his
children out of school!
11.1.Lanok
made several serious blunders with crop establishment (in one case
costing a farmer who was entirely debt free R 64,000.00) and then refused
to take responsibility for this (contrary to the mission statement).
12.
Eventually they were
forced to leave the area by the Provincial Government leaving behind
about R 1,5 million rands of debt farmed up by them - but on the
names of the farmers they came to show how to farm successfully (not
forgetting that they said they take full responsibility).
13.
One farmer was left with
absolutely nothing on his lands - the one that was wanting to develop a communally run service centre
for his fellows.
14.
The Provincial
Government has now taken over the
debts.
15.
I briefed counsel and
appointed an attorney to act under Legal Aid for two of the farmers in
order to obtain title to the land under the Irrigation Act (something that the Transitional
Council has been withholding from them through endless political manoeuvring,
and to sue for damages.
16.
In the mean time a
highly aggressive and reasonably discreditation campaign has been waged against
me with the other farmers through clandestine meetings wherein my
investigations are attacked as spurious and the farmers I represent as stupid
because they are closing doors for themselves on future assistance by asking me
to represent them and supporting the investigations of the Commission I head
up.
Shortly after this the Department of Agriculture
produced a proposal for a Service Centre which would be controlled by
a hierarchy which left the farmers
right at the bottom after the Department of Agriculture, the Transitional
Council, the funders and the local community (who were benefiting from
agricultural training). The proposal suggests that:-
1. the
farmers are not ready to own and run such a center (most had already
bought their own implements before Lanok arrived and run them very
successfully).
2.
It was suggested that they needed more finance from the Land Bank,
3. that
Lucerne must be planted,
4. that
they were now destitute and in need of immediate help and training and
5. that
it was a severe blow to their chances at survival now that Lanok had left
the area.
At a meeting in Cape town I put pressure on Lanok
about their activities. They said that they had ceded the loans to the
government. They said that the government was not going to write the loans
off. This proved to be a blatant and highly manipulative lie when I
checked with Members of the Provincial Government about this
When I questioned them about MI activity, Mr.
De Wet, instead of being concerned, dismissing the idea out of hand (that is,
without having so much as seen the evidence), and denied it vehemently.
The very next day after the meeting however, I was
followed into the staff toilets of a gas station in Swellendam by an MI
agent armed with a 9 mm Glock pistol equipped with a 6 inch silencer. He
was intent on shooting me so I was forced to knock him out and disarm him (I
suppose 4 Dan's serve their purpose, even to sick beneficiaries of the
training). Lanok have for some time now engaged in very cagey back room tactics
and have resorted to the classic stone walling tactic used by persons under
investigation who are trying to buy time to delay exposure.
A
large brief to council exists on their activities and the matter has been
handed to a well known firm of Human Rights attorneys in the Cape who will be
litigating with Legal Aid from the state. The case is simplicity itself. Lanok
failed to deliver according to it’s mandate (which was heavily subsidised (well
over 80%) by the Department of Housing) and are therefore not entitled
to payment. The instrument of debt is therefore irrelevant to the litigation.
What is relevant however, is the damages caused by Lanok. In the case of one
farmer alone the amount claimed for damages due to Lanok’s activities is R
700,000.00.
It was not long after this that Skills for Africa
appeared on the scene.
On my
return to Goodhouse in the Northern Cape recently, a group calling themselves Skills
for Africa, funded by the Department of Labour gave a talk here
as to how they are going to ‘help the local farming community to develop the necessary agricultural skills
needed to fully utilise the new project by the Dept. of Agriculture’.
Typical
of the type of front organisations that Military Intelligence (MI) use to
brainwash people, they start off, not with agricultural training, but with a
classic program of Gradualist Sociological Conditioning. I took
some notes - this is the opening first few days of sessions:-
Life
Skills
10.
responsibility
11.
self respect
12.
stress management
13.
leadership
qualities
14.
conflict
management
15.
communication
16.
interactive
workshop
The
above has obviously got absolutely nothing to do with planting and harvesting crops but with Social Engineering instead.
Prior
to the meeting, I asked the persons directly if they were not just an MI front
organisation such as Adult Education Consultants[35] that
were set up under Dr. Johan Van Der Westhuizen by Tertius Delport
the MEC for Agriculture in the Cape, or the group under Mc Sweeny
(using Costallo as the psychiatrist) that operated from Voortrekker
Hoogte and used Warmbad just North of Goodhouse as a stage two
training camp. I noted that their attitude was extremely negative, suspicious
and almost aggressive toward me and that Jan Zandberg from the Department of
Agriculture who arranged for their visit here found it difficult to hide
how unpleased he was that I was attending the meeting.
Present
were Johan Potgieter (Skills For Africa) Jan Zanberg (Dept. of
Agriculture) and Hjalmar Enderstein (Training
Advisor for the Department of Labour).
The Department
of Labour is also Closely linked to Surplus Peoples Projects, an
International funded organisation which has cause tremendous strife in local
communities, so much so that senior members of other Agricultural Unions are
experiencing major problems with their activities[36].
First
we must take a closer look at the Department of Agriculture and it’s aids,
You see it is here where the problem lies. I was told by a senior official of
one of the leading Agricultural Unions in South Africa that those members of
the Department that did not fall in with the minister of Agriculture’s Process
were simply replaced under the Affirmative Action Program - or they
could fall into line (promptly of course):- Let’s look at what the Minister’s
Process is all about:-
When
one considers what The Minister of Agriculture, Mr. Derek Hanekom (also
referred to as the Land Affairs Minister) recently stated in a briefing
to the media and the Diplomatic Corps[37],
(shortly before the Rands crashed again) it is easy to identify where things
are headed. This genius who insisted on the “equitable access to land
“ clause (an aggressively centralist anti- private ownership political doctrine)
and caused the rand to fall 20% in one day (the day the Constitution with the
clause intact passed through Parliament, has now caused another land slide in
the rand - this ‘man of vision’ said inter alia:-
1. The government may soon be
forced to expropriate land....... the recent attempt in Zimbabwe to
forcibly expropriate white owned land had shown local landowners
the there were much harsher programmes right on our doorstep.
2. Potentially explosive
legislation will be table later this year aimed at resolving the issue of
land ownership.
Authors
note:- Interesting wording
considering the civil war type wave of farm murders afoot in South Africa since
the elections in 1994
1. Thirteen percent of South
Africa’s land fell into the category of Tribal Land that was administered and distributed by ‘Traditional
Authorities’ and the Government would not be awarding title deeds.
In
other words, farmers must be kept from acquiring title so that centralist
government control can be maintained. The government will decide who gets
access. Who better that someone who has a sword of Damocles in the form of huge
loans (preferably to the government) hanging over his head. If most of your
income goes to paying off loans - who do you work for - who tells you what to
do - who owns you - who owns your land - who decides your future - who better
you ingratiate yourself with - who will you then vote for?..
Let
us take a look at who entered the scene next....
On
the 8th and 9th of this month the local Department of Agriculture brought a
team from the defunct Agricultural Credit Board to Henkries (about 20 km
from Goodhouse) in order to finalise loan applications that a group of Goodhouse
farmers had made during the time that they were operating.
It
was in the light of the Lanok debacle that Mr. Charles Cloete asked me to
represent him when talking to this organisation. He did not want to be
caught again, and so he asked them to deal with me on his behalf rather. The
Agricultural Credit Board and the Department of Agriculture stubbornly refused
to do so, in stead they:-
1. repeatedly approaching Mr Cloete
directly (completely ignoring his pleas for them to talk to me instead) and
2. repeatedly attempted to get him
to sign the loan application.
3. In the mean time I was subjected to
the most aggressive behaviour and ruthlessly provoked. The Department of
Agriculture played a leading role in all of this.
It
all started when I introduced myself as their legal adviser and told them that
I am investigation MI style brainwashing techniques conducted under the
cover of Agricultural Training through government affiliated
organisation.
Instead
of the concern one would expect from anyone who was not involved, I was again
presented with:-
a. flat denial, and
b. a judgement that it was utter
nonsense (without even so much as having heard of any of the evidence, never
mind sight any).
These
of course are the classic earmarks of those who are caught red handed:-
1. Pretend your crimes do not
exist,
2. Ignore the investigating
officer,
3. Try to discredit him,
4. Proceed regardless.
5. Stonewall everything from
then on
6. Buy as much time as you can.
Now
this is not at all surprising when one considers what they were trying to
hide:-
A
Completely unreasonable Instrument of Debt
I
viewed the Loan Application and discovered that it constituted an instrument
of debt. It irrevocably binds the applicant (borrower) inter alia to
the following :-
1. That borrower, in the execution
of his farming activities, has to procure the advice of the Advisory Service of the
Agricultural Credit Board (lender).
2. That he is bound to
participate in any ‘nasorgaksie’ (directly translated as ‘after care
action’) of the lender.
3. That the farming operation
must be conducted to the ‘satisfaction of the Minister of Agriculture’.
4. That he indemnifies the lender,
any of its employees or agents, the Minister of Agriculture, the state
or any of its agents against any damage or loss of whatever nature whether
directly or indirectly, that may have any relationship of whatever nature with
the application or the lender.
5. Moreover, the borrower is
expected to grant the lender the right to nevertheless withdraw the
assistance at any time for any reason that the director of the Board may
deem fit.
Whilst
I was acting as the an independent Cashlink
Advisor for the Bank of New Zealand in my capacity as the CEO of a
Corporate and Financial Planning Company in Sydney, registered as a Dealers
Representative on the Sydney Stock Exchange and a member of the International
Financial Planners Association, I had never witnessed such outrageous
chancery ever, not even from countries which have questionable financial
status. Agreements such as these would be subject to heavy penalties in
developed countries and in some cases be open to suits of crimen injuria.
When
I pressed ahead with the process, save for signing the application, they
wanted a loan repayment schedule from my client on a loan which had long since
prescribed and should have been covered by the state in the first place.
All
from an organisation which is regarded with disdain internationally for their
highly questionable tactics and which was finally deregistered by an Act of
Parliament.
The
other farmer I represent, Mr B J Cloete, the one on who’s farm I reside,
was told that his loan was inexplicably turned down. All
the farmers had their loans managed en masse by the Department of
Agriculture.
This
was also the farmer that received a bill from the Agricultural Credit Board
for money which was actually due and owing to Lanok. This meant that there
was a link between the two and when I asked for further details I
received no reply. The farmer however, continues to get the same bill.
Present
at the meeting were members of the local
Department of Agriculture[40] (who
were drawing up the Business Plans for this highly questionable
arrangement). Clark Cotton were also present as they agreed to handle
the Crop Sessions required for the servicing of the loans. Lonrho
who had visited the area an Oranje Corporation that were asked to get
involved but were discouraged by the local Department of Agriculture
were not present as alternative service providers and as far as I know were not
notified by the local Department of Agriculture of the meeting.
During
the drawing up of the Business Plan the Land Bank of South Africa was
repeatedly suggested as the only viable alternative for Crop Establishment
finance.
I
viewed a recent Land Bank application which is also drafted as an
instrument of debt, in letter form.:-
1. The document contains some 3 pages
of terms and conditions such as would be contained in a loan agreement,
and in fact constitutes an instrument of debt on the face of it.
2. It however, makes reference in bold
letters to a Promissory Note that needs to signed prior to the loan
being granted
3. The Promissory Note (which
has the effect because of it’s ranking as a Note and not ‘Paper’, of Novating
everything stated in the letter) states the following:-
a. I, the undersigned _____ ID No _____
promise to pay to the Land - and Agricultural Bank of South Africa at Visagie
street 192, Pretoria, the sum of R_____ (______) at an interest rate that the
bank may from time to time establish and on such dates and terms as the bank
may determine.
Needless
to say, this is the penultimate of thuggery. There can be nothing worse than
this save for open robbery.
Well that just about puts
the final nail in the coffin, doesn’t it?
This
is the organisation that tried to displace 40,000 people from their traditional
homeland in the Transkey to the banks of the Orange River in order to provide a
larger voters base for the ANC in the area. One day I had an interesting
contact with their agent for the area, one
Sue Powell. I was discussing a proposed tourism development (with the
aid of the African Project Development Facility - an organ of the World
Bank) with a proposed beneficiary of
the aid when the party of SPP was mistaken for some tourists which we
approached for their comments (just as an impromptu field study of tourist
preferences). Once I introduced myself to this party (consisting of SPP, the
Transitional Regional Council, an employee of the Springbok tourist office and
an independent consulting firm), and especially after they were told that I was
not only heading up the development proposal but also investigating the
manipulation thrust upon the local community I was treated to some rather
frosty and extremely authoritarian and arrogant challenges like:-
Who
said these people can develop here without the governments permission - this
area falls under Act 9 1987 (previous dispensation’s heavily centralist
apartheid legislation)
This
region controls tourism. Only 10 4X4 vehicles at time may pass through here
(perpetuation of authoritarian control)
No
Private ownership of property can ensue - Act 9 1987. And not even the opinions
of Drs. of law would sway her stance
The
fact is that the Irrigation Act gives effect to the limits imposed on the doctrine
of public domain in Capitalist states in that it provides for title to ensue to
whoever developed the land for irrigation. When I informed her of this she said
“but the Department of Agriculture developed this land - they therefor have
control. This is true with regards to all the new farmers under the new
development but not the previous farmers. However, she let the cat out the bag
on that strategy. That explains why the
Dept of Agriculture want to prevent a private service center and wish to have control
of such a center themselves. The plot is clear - keep farmers broke and
indebted, subservient and the beneficiaries of their help with no prospect of
ownership only an endless perpetuation of manipulation - create a group of
Robots - this has so far been quite successful under the previous regime - why
not now.
Just
across the boarder lies a private farm. There is absolutely no comparison.
There is vast agricultural progress afoot there whereas here there is nothing
save for the scant little plots built up by the previously (and still)
disadvantaged.
SPP
went so far to tell a lady renting a property near the punt not to sell wood to
passing tourists. In other words - you may only exploit opportunities if we say
so.
SPP
were there to have a meeting for Tourist Development. However, the farmers on
who’s land this was to take place were excluded from the meeting. The meeting
was held with members of the community who had established a reputation as
trouble causer’s and comprised the town drunks.
Political
parties and various Agricultural Unions and organisations all have major
complaints about SPP deliberately causing conflict in communities.
When
one researches where some of SPP’s funding comes from, do not be surprised if
you come across Ambrossas Bank in the South of France (a Jesuit front
Organisation).
The
Jesuit Oath as published by Jack T Chick[42] in the
revelation of ex Jesuit priest Alberto Riviera[43], makes no
bones about their aims. In summary they are as follows:-
1.
Select a peaceful
and self sustaining community
2.
Cause divisions,
conflict and war in the area
3.
Finance both
sides of the conflict if possible
4.
See the economy,
society and infrastructure destroyed
5.
Enter the scene
openly now offering solutions for peace and finance for reconstruction and
development
6.
Brainwash the
community into a new mind set
7.
Now you control
them socially, economically and strategically.
8.
Enjoy the profits
This
is the age old Machiavellian doctrine of Ordo Ab Chao ( also the motto
of 33rd degree Free Masons) - Order out of Chaos.
This process is discussed in depth over 1, 642 pages
of court record in the Bible case[44]
quoted earlier. I shall just attach here an organisational diagram that should
cast some condensed light on the topic.
In this case, the local minister was replaced through
a slandering campaign and replaced with what a well brainwashed model who
preaches ‘text book’ sermons designed to condition his congregation into ‘a new
enlightenment’. The teaching has strong Liberal Theology (Higher Criticism, Geo
Social Biblical Hermeneutics etc.) leanings, which are of course aimed at
secular encapsulement.
There
is so much more that can be included here, but time is not available.
Instead,
I shall add hereto, some extracts of documents that may shed further light on
the topic. I think however, what is contained herein so far should clearly
establish the allegation beyond reasonable doubt to anyone with a modicum of
common sense and even slight powers of deduction. A Bibliography covering the
topic which was built up over the last seven years comprises some 30 pages of
books on it’s own. It would be a massive task to quote exhaustively on the
issue and that is why this report is by way of a summary only.
However,
what might very well prove to be the best indicator that I had hit the nail on
the head right into a can of worms whilst investigating this latest issue is
the reaction I got:-
A
sniper from a South African Infantry Battalion who is from time to time used by
both Military Intelligence (MI) and
National Intelligence in operations to 'neutralise' persons who pose a threat
to National Security. Said sniper is one of three snipers still using 7,62 mm
(308 calibre) rifles. He is also adept at using long range tranquilliser dart
equipment. Said sniper lives near
Poffadder in the Northern Cape and from time to time works for the organisation
which is installing the Dept. of Agriculture funded Irrigation Pipeline in
Goodhouse. Said sniper was asked to obtain the whereabouts of Izak
Labuschagne and neutralise him. The NI fax he was shown reflected a ‘sper
datum’ of 25 - 30th October 1998. Sniper said he would let them know. Sniper
also indicated that some judge who was operating for (NI) was exposed due to my
activities and that this was the reason I had become a problem for NI.. It also
appears that my wife’s continued persistence with the problem is further
aggravating the situation. Said sniper and I had met before I left for Cape
Town and had good in depth conversation. He immediately sought me out on my
return and gave me the information related above.
One would have to be part
of the lunatic fringe to believe that all this is coincidence, or have immense
faith in improbabilities - all of which could impossibly escape the impression
that extraordinary lengths are being gone to cover up the plot.
These farmers have been had
in a way that I have never witnessed before, or ever thought I would. It is a
nightmare of absolutely frightening proportions. Enough to make anyone acutely
outraged.
The question is - what
should be done about this, and is there anyone not too numbed by The
Process out there that WILL do something about this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First off - you have an
obligation to warn your friends. Secondly start using your head, instead of allowing others use it for you!
by Izak Labuschagne
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Izak Labuschagne, who has been a member of the International
Association of Financial Planners since March 1988 is also certified as a Dealers
Representative under the News South Wales Securities Code in Australia and
an authorised Accredited Investment Advisor of the Bank of New Zealand,
Cashlink. He currently heads up a private actio popularis Commission
of Inquiry under section 38 of the South African Constitution which
investigates Judicial Irregularities in the Administration of Justice and
Activities by Members of Secret Societies. He has consulted to and represented political parties and international
church denominations in the Courts, up to Constitutional Court level
in South Africa. He is a founder member of the Charter Boat Association in
Durban. Apart from being involved in several other projects he has various
other qualifications and abilities which bear little or no relevance to this
report and are therefore not worth mentioning. Labuschagne is currently on
holiday in the area in question, having taken a break from his usual activities
for medical reasons. From an availability point of view it should be noted that
he will need to undergo an operation in the near future and wishes to travel
overseas in order to complete and promote the first of 3 volumes that will
serve the purpose of documenting the findings of the commission as well as an
accompanying TV documentary, as soon as possible. Address P O Box 137
Steinkopf, 8244 Tel No’s (0251) 5842
1 [1]Weekly Mail and Guardian February 1994
2 [2]BAM v ACDP Supreme Court Johannesburg Case No 94/25886
3 [3]Intercepted in 1979 by The Agency For Joint Intelligence Newsletters. William Cooper (Ex USA Navy Intelligence), Camp Verde, Arizona, 86322, USA, Tel (602) 567-636,00 / 00 / 00, Daily Update (602) 1-900-535-9800 ext 240, Computer BBS (602) 567-6725, Hotline (213) 281-8222,000000, Orders (602) 567 6109 Research Center (602) 567 6536.
4 [4]Mainstream Newsletter Address P O Box 1850, Kempton Park, 1620 (South African office) published by P Tillen o Banner ministries UK
5 [5]See the video tape on MK Ultra distributed through Preach the Word Ministries at P O Box 115 Underberg, 3257, Natal Tel 033 7011 539
6 [6]See SAA in-flight magazine “The Flying Springbok” April 1997 wherein Prof Lovemore Mbigi promotes Ubuntu as “ the spirit of African management” - He admits that it is a philosophy and he explains the “process” of this philosophy in South African Multinational Companies.
7 [7]see post amble of interim Constitution Act 200 of 1993 . This post amble entitled “National Unity and Reconciliation” is included under Schedule 6 (22) of the final legislation.
8 [8]4th Floor Titaco House 63 Juta Street, Cnr Bertha and Joubert Street, Braamfontein, 2001, P O Box 31389 Braamfontein, 2017 Tel (011) 339 3474/5
9 [9]Dated 22 March 1994, sent by fax No. 949 7304 at 9:54 a.m. from a Company called PRINTRIGHT by one, A Viljoen as a ‘Directive’ from National Intelligence Private Bag X87, Pretoria Tel 323 4133, Telegraphic Address NASVEIL
10[10] Cyril Madlala 21/10/1995,
11[11]Treaty on the Principals of Interstate Relations and Co-operation Between the Republic of South Africa and the Republic of India 25/1/1995.
12[12]Ibid. Clause 6
13[13]Section 231 (4)&(5) of the new Constitution of South Africa
14[14]Vol 69, December 1989 - article written by Charles Villa Vicencio.
15[15]See “The Struggle for the Church in South Africa” by Rachel Tingle ISBN 0 9513721 1 4
16[16]Year 6 No 3 1995
17[17]CT 42/96
18[18]Puckrin AJ
19[19]En Route to Global Occupation by Garry Allen page 60
20[20]Secular Humanism by John Whitehead ISBN 0-8474-0843-4 page 15
21[21]Rand Afrikaans University 17/09/81
22[22] Case No CT 42/96 in the Constitutional Court of South Africa. In this case a ruling was upheld on appeal (no hearing was had) that amounted to the fact that churches can no longer use the Bible as authority in order to settle disciplinary matters. The Bible was effectively thrown out of church and the Courts were now able to dictate religious practice in churches without having to consider Biblical principals.
23[23]operating out of 155 Loop Street, Cape Town, P O Box 16526 Vlaeberg 8010, Tel (021) 22 2970 Fax (021) 22 2934, They presented the following workshops :-
24[24]See proposal accepted in principal by The African Project Development Facility - as subsidiary of the World Bank (International Bank For reconstruction and Development)
25[25]The Irrigation Act precludes the existence of Public Domain (in the interest of Capitalism) in such instances
26[26]Lanok operates out of their head office in Southern Paarl and is active by way of project offices in Franshoek, Haarlem, Genadendal, Dysselsdorp, Zoar, Macassar and Henkries. Directors include Dr. Low Alberts, Tom De Wet, P. D. Mc Ennery, G. S. Bosch, D. P Daniels and Dr. R. E. Van Der Ross
27[27](clause (a) Agreement signed 25/1/93)
28[28](clause 6.1 agreement signed 11/1/93
29[29](clause 4 (i) & (iii)).
30[30]Clause 5 agreement signed 11/1/93
31[31]Clause (b) 25/1/93
32[32]Clause 3.3 Agreement signed 11 Feb 1998
33[33]Clause 3 of the initial agreement signed at inception.
34[34]Skills for Africa operates out of Upington Tel. (054) 3312 370, Pretoria (012) 809 0337, Graskop (013) 767 1223 and Klerksdorp (018) 468 8195 - all near MI field research units. Enderstein operates from Laboria House on the Corner of Pniel and Compound streets in Kimberly Tel (0531) 881 523 P O Box X5012, E-mail Hjalmar @labournc.ncape.gov.ZA.
35[35]See Organisational diagram under Annexure “A” hereto
36[36]See Organisational diagram under Annexure “A” hereto
37[37]as reported in the Sunday Independent of 15 February 1998
38[38]Operating out of Opera Plaza Building, private Bag X 118, Pretoria 0001 Tel (012) 310 4911 fax 325 7099
39[39]Operating out of P O Box 524, Douglas, 8730 Tel (053) 581 0050, (053) 298 1832 Rep Pieter Dreyer.
40[40]Operating out of the Old Mutual Building, P O Box 18 Springbok, Northern Cape, Tel (0251) 2135 Fx 22270
41[41]Operating out of _______________________________________, Tel _______________ rep ____________
42[42]The Engineer Corps from Hell by Edwin A Sherman page 118 - JTC Publications P O Box 662 Chino Calif. 91708-0662 USA
43[43]ex Bishop San Lorenzo Spain ID 107048 1967. Contact A I C Box 31340 LA Calif. USA
44[44]CT 42/96 Constitutional Court of South Africa